In honor of Alexander Graham Bell's 164 birthday, here is a little tale about the telephone.
My first year as a principal I had a problem common among new principals: I was overwhelmed with the volume of calls to return. I was falling further behind all the time. I was prioritizing the issue that was right in front of me involving students or teachers. I was putting out fires and learning the school. I thought I was keeping up with it all.
In the spring of that year, the search committee that had first interviewed me reconvened to give me feedback about the first few months of my principalship. Fortunately, there was lots of positive news. However, among the more critical feedback was the feeling that I was not responsive to parents.
Some heard complaints that I never returned calls or that by the time I finally got to them, the issue was passé.
Ouch. This was not the way I wanted things to be. For a few minutes, I looked about for someone to blame. While I could find fault in others for a couple of specific instances, it became clear to me that I had not made responding to parents enough of a priority in my daily workflow. Once I properly placed the blame at my own feet, I had to figure out how to fix it.
Over the next several months and into the next school year, I worked out a system with the secretary* that reversed the problem enough that the end of year survey showed no problem for year two.
First, the secretary would screen calls to try to determine the real urgency. She would also ask if the parent had spoken with the teacher yet. If not, the secretary would ask the parent to contact the teacher first about the issue. Some parents had talked with the teacher, while a few convinced the secretary that they had.
Next, the secretary would email me with the subject line starting in "Call:" followed by the name and phone number (for more on how I use email to manage todos, read this). We used only the email system for low to medium priority return calls. If the secretary felt that the call was more important, she would email and either speak with me or leave a written message in a special spot on my desk.
So far, this system was essentially what hadn't been working. So, I added into the mix a change in mindset: Every call deserves a reply right away.
Since the workload or pace of the day had not lessened, I also started asking the secretary to make some return calls. Now, please don't think that I had the secretary do my work for me. I would ask her to call the parent and do what she needed to make sure the parent knew I would take the time to listen. So, the secretary would assess from the tone of the parent which of the following was enough. One, just the word that I knew of the call and promised to return it soon. Two, a scheduled return call. The secretary accessed my calendar and put in the phone call as an appointment for me. Three, skip the phone and get a face-to-face meeting scheduled.
With this return call made by the secretary, the parent knew that I was going to give the time needed. The parent knew that the call was important to the principal. Many invitations to a meeting were declined; the parents would say the issue wasn't that important. Whatever the response, the parent usually hung up satisfied for the time being.
There were some variations on this system. In some cases, the secretary would just skip right to the meeting without giving me the initial message. This was usually a stroke of genius as the secretary was far better tuned to emotions than I. In other situations, I would ask the secretary to skip right to the meeting because I knew enough of the situation. I also sometimes asked the secretary not to return the call at all. Instead, I would go speak with the teacher and ask her to call first. In most cases, the parent really didn't want to speak with the principal, the parent just wanted resolution.
There were a few drawbacks to this system. Not everyone was satisfied having to wait; they expected the principal to available to them at all times. Also, this increased the workload on the secretary. Finally, there were a couple of times where I got the email, but just did not call back in a timely manner - a couple of times, but far less than before.
All told, I am pleased to have gotten the situation under control by making sure that parents felt like I was listening and that I cared; we benefitted from a stronger relationship.
And after all, it's all about relationships.
*For purposes of anonymity and due to multiple personnel involved in secretarial tasks, I am using the term "the secretary" to describe the actions of at least three different people in two different roles over three different years.
Cross posted to Connected Principals
Friday, February 11, 2011
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
Carefully Used Data Can Lead to Positive Change (#14inFeb)
It all started in a year when we really began to gather and analyze reading data about students. We weren't test-crazy, but we asked for a lot of data from teachers. Some at the school were none too keen on using data to make decisions. Some thought it was too impersonal and took the teacher out of the picture.
Anyway, part of the work was to create a data wall initially showing reading level (Fountas and Pinnell) for any student receiving regular education or special education reading support. For the most part, our models included in class support from tutors or special ed assistants and pull out services from the reading specialist or special education teacher. The data went up on the wall in two phases. First the students receiving regular ed support, later the special ed support.
Well, when I looked at the reading levels for the special education students, I was shocked. There were four of five students in the same special education pull-out group reading solidly on grade level. That's right, they were being pulled out and were reading on grade level!
When I sat with the special ed coordinator, and I asked why keep them in pull-out reading if they are reading on grade level? Were we educating these kids in the least restrictive environment?
We talked for a long time about what this means. We talked about each student and studied their IEPs. We talked about the individual stories that led to pull-out reading services. We strategized about how to work with parents who might be reluctant to sign an IEP that did not have pull-out reading.
Most excitingly, we talked about how we could have fewer pull-out sections and move more special ed teachers back into regular ed classrooms to co-teach or work with students during reader's workshop. This model was working well for several students, it was time to expand it. While planning for the next school year, we worked on including more students for both reading and math. We found ways to use our special ed teachers in the regular ed classrooms. We began to change services at IEP meetings. We made it work.
While we did not convince everyone in the building that careful use of data could be a good thing, we made progress. We made a positive change for several students.
Anyway, part of the work was to create a data wall initially showing reading level (Fountas and Pinnell) for any student receiving regular education or special education reading support. For the most part, our models included in class support from tutors or special ed assistants and pull out services from the reading specialist or special education teacher. The data went up on the wall in two phases. First the students receiving regular ed support, later the special ed support.
Well, when I looked at the reading levels for the special education students, I was shocked. There were four of five students in the same special education pull-out group reading solidly on grade level. That's right, they were being pulled out and were reading on grade level!
When I sat with the special ed coordinator, and I asked why keep them in pull-out reading if they are reading on grade level? Were we educating these kids in the least restrictive environment?
We talked for a long time about what this means. We talked about each student and studied their IEPs. We talked about the individual stories that led to pull-out reading services. We strategized about how to work with parents who might be reluctant to sign an IEP that did not have pull-out reading.
Most excitingly, we talked about how we could have fewer pull-out sections and move more special ed teachers back into regular ed classrooms to co-teach or work with students during reader's workshop. This model was working well for several students, it was time to expand it. While planning for the next school year, we worked on including more students for both reading and math. We found ways to use our special ed teachers in the regular ed classrooms. We began to change services at IEP meetings. We made it work.
While we did not convince everyone in the building that careful use of data could be a good thing, we made progress. We made a positive change for several students.
Related articles
- The Power of a Data Room (principalj.blogspot.com)

Tuesday, February 8, 2011
1st Grade Writing. Only a Little Snow! (#14inFeb)
Image via WikipediaI am still plugging away on the writing project with local first graders. Although with snow days almost every week since mid December, the timing is all off.I met with Mrs. Smith's group earlier today for the first time a couple of weeks. It was nice to see that we really have been making progress. Some of the group is about ready to type their writing. Others are making slow progress.
I am still getting used to dealing with first grade bounciness. Today I tried to ignore some of the silly behavior as long as the student was still focusing some. IT worked for a while. John, who was the silliest turned out to be the farthest along in his writing. He also did a great job listening to direct feedback about his writing. He understood that he had to revise to make it better and fix the spelling errors. Mary also did ok with editing. She caught some of her mistakes while we read her work together, but had missed them when reading alone.
Here is more details about today's work:
- John, Mary, and Sally are all finished a first draft of their section of the book (really a section is a paragraph). I have started editing with them.
- Next week, John, Mary, and Sally will be able to type their sections to be ready for publishing.
- Steve, who missed some weeks earlier, is almost caught up to John, Mary, and Sally.
- Danny is writing tons, but needs constant reminders to stick to his topic and not get too creative (it is non-fiction after all).
- Jane is still very carefully plodding through writing out each of her sentences. Mrs. Smith concurs that Jane works very slowly and carefully.
- The big question this week was what is going on with Susan. She was almost somber today. She hardly seemed to understand what to do. Susan showed no interest in following Mary's lead like she had previously. Mrs. Smith confirmed that there is something going on and will call mom.
I look forward to meeting with all three first grade classrooms this week. It will be nice to get in a whole week for a change.
Related articles
- Topic Sentence? I'll give you a topic sentence. (principalspov.blogspot.com)
- The Librarian and the Rules, Girls and Boys (principalspov.blogspot.com)
- Dogs or the Library: Let 1st Graders Decide! (retitled) (principalspov.blogspot.com)

Labels:
14inFeb,
students,
Volunteering,
Writing
Thursday, February 3, 2011
6 Most popular posts of 2010 (#14in Feb)
So, here it is, the moment you have all been waiting for:
The Principal's Point of View 6 Most Popular Posts of 2010 (as counted by pageviews). These are listed in order, but I no longer have the count for each post.
Guskey and Grading: Lots to Think About Mar 21, 2010
Well, I hope that some of these posts interest you. Or, I hope that you re-read these posts. You never know what you will find the second time around.
Thanks for a great 2010. Now on to 2011. (I know that we are already one month into 2011, I'm just catching up is all.)
The Principal's Point of View 6 Most Popular Posts of 2010 (as counted by pageviews). These are listed in order, but I no longer have the count for each post.
Guskey and Grading: Lots to Think About Mar 21, 2010
Still popular, this post followed my attendance at a conference where Thomas Guskey spoke about grading and reporting practices. He gave the team from my school a whole new perspective on our style of grading and reporting. Since we already were using a standards-based report card, we focused mostly on the use of zero, percentages, and those compliance items like attendance, participation, behavior in our grades. I am pleased that this post has remained popular as Guskey's work has had a large impact on my thinking.Inform, Invite, Perform (and Feed): A Plan to Increase Aug 6, 2010
While preparing for a job interview where I knew that parental involvement was going to be a topic, I came up with "Inform, Invite, Perform" as a way to frame questions about involvement. While at the interview, I mentioned the phrase and made a joke about it being the title of my next book or blog post. Well, once I said that I had to write the blog post and flesh out the ideas. I guess that it worked as I became a finalist.Principal-at-large Or, The Once and Future Principal Oct 6, 2010
By October, it became clear that I was not going to find a principal position for the current school year. This post tells that story and what my plans are for the year. I will write an update post sometime soon.My EdCampKC Resources Nov 7, 2010
I loved leading a session at my first edcamp, EdCampKC (that's Missouri, folks). Part of the coolness of an unconference is sharing, so I shared. I guess a bunch of people were interested in seeing what I prepared for the session on education reform. I have since revised the presentation and used the other items for EdCampNYC. Take a look, you might find something interesting.Can't you just follow your passions on the weekend? Dec 15, 2010
Passion was a hot topic among educators in December. I jumped on the bandwagon when I overheard part of a conversation while sitting in a coffee shop. It was the right topic at the right time, as I got several comments. Also, I found a really cool picture of a passion flower.Forget Value Added Assessment of Teachers - Just Use Snow Dec 27, 2010
Well we thought the December blizzard was snowpocalypse. Hmmph! I'll show you snow. We have had tons more snow since I wrote this post about gauging teachers on how they respond to their students. Still a good point, even if there has been five more feet of snow since then.
Well, I hope that some of these posts interest you. Or, I hope that you re-read these posts. You never know what you will find the second time around.
Thanks for a great 2010. Now on to 2011. (I know that we are already one month into 2011, I'm just catching up is all.)
Related articles
- 14 in February Blogging Challenge (#14inFeb) (principalspov.blogspot.com)
- Change is the only constant (#14inFeb) (principalspov.blogspot.com)
- My Top Five Posts From 2010 (burlingtonhigh.blogspot.com)
- The Innovative Educator's Top Posts (and Reflections) for 2010 (theinnovativeeducator.blogspot.com)
- Most Popular Posts of 2010. (principalspage.com)

Labels:
14inFeb,
EdReform,
opinion,
ReportCards,
Writing
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
Change is the only constant (#14inFeb)
I was inspired to create the challenge after attending Educon 2.3 in Philadelphia this past weekend. That wonderful weekend of professional development and networking will give me lots to write about. Since I want to publish something right away and frequently, I will not write a thorough review of my experience. Instead, I will write several small posts discussing something from EduCon. Here it goes.
At the Friday night panel on innovation, the facilitator started things off with some quotes. Several caught my attention, including this:
When you're finished changing, you're finished. Ben FranklinThere is much written about lifelong learning and about change being the only constant. As an educator, this important for obvious reasons. More personally, I find that my thinking and outlook are in constant flux - especially since creating my twitter PLN (e.g. much of what I believe about Effective Leadership has changed in the last couple years). At the same time, many of my ideals have remained the same for years (e.g. my Philosophy of Education has been consistent since 1996).
The take-away here and from the innovation panel discussion is that change and innovation are necessary in our lives and in our schools. It is the only constant.
Related articles
- 14 in February Blogging Challenge (#14inFeb) (principalspov.blogspot.com)
- Why Blog? (principalj.blogspot.com)
- 21st Century Skills in Action (akevy613.posterous.com)
- Day One FETC - Florida Education Technology Conference (weprincipal.blogspot.com)
- Sharpening the Axe (transleadership.net)
- EduCon Reflection - Seriously Silly (practicaltheory.org)

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
